GottaGettaBLOG!

A Leadership Development and Life Coach Blog by Barry Zweibel, MBA, MCC, GottaGettaCoach!, Inc.

  • "Do BETTER. Because You can. Because You want to. Because it's time."
       ~ Barry Zweibel, GGCI
  • Random Posts

    Read a Random Post

  • Advertisements

Category: Leadership Development

Why Make Work Meaningful?

Meaning making is as valued as money making for your work teams today, according to University of Michigan business professor Dave Ulrich.” So says CIOInsight.com as a preface to its “The Real Value in Making Work Meaningful” slide show. “While corporate money-making has obvious ROI, Ulrich identifies key performance indicators that can help every CIO determine the value of engaging employees with meaningful work.”

According to Ulrich, “Investment in employees too often translates to fancy lunches or performance-based bonus plans without addressing the value of the work itself.” Now I like this — especially since it falls right in line with the teachings of one of my all-time favorite management theorists, Frederick Hertzberg.*

So, while the complete 14-slide presentation can be linked to above, here, for your more immediate viewing pleasure, are some excerpts:

(Clicking on slides in this gallery will expand them to full size.)

—–

*For more on the work of Frederick Hertzberg here’s a post about it from the GottaGettaBLOG! archives: http://www.ggci.com/blog/2006/01/how-do-you-motivate-employees.htm.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. David Clutterbuck Presentation
  2. Marshall Goldsmith Keynote
  3. Slide, that is, DON'T Slide
  4. Connecting Better

2010q3 GGCI Newsletter

The 2010q3 edition of the GottaGettaCoach! newsletter is now on-line at: http://www.ggci.com/newsletter/GGCI-2010q3.pdf.

  • The Botany of Self-Doubt • Topic: Fear and Courageousness •  Subject: What to do when self-doubt strikes and how to manage it more effectively.
  • The ABCs of Good Employees…& Bad Bosses • Topic: Leadership Development •  Subject: Why “A-players hire A-players; B-players hire C-players” is misguided, at best, and downright inflammatory, at worst.
  • What Job Would Make You Happy? • Topic: Career Development •  Subject: Time for a change? Try this visualization exercise to figure out where you should go next with your career.
  • A Noun Called ‘Happiness’ • Topic: Personal Fulfillment •  Subject: A simple way to ‘tune in’ to more happiness.
  • On Being Fully Present • Topic: Personal Development •  Subject: A quick set of five tweets about the concept of being Fully Present.
  • It’s “Nuts” Trying to Get Your Unmet Needs Met at Work • Topic: Personal/Professional Development •  Subject: It really is. So here’s how to get those unmet needs met elsewhere.
  • LeadershipHaiku • Topic: Leadership Development • Subject: More // Leadership coaching / in seventeen syllables / for busy bosses. //
  • Clean Hands Clear Conscience • Topic: Personal/Professional Development •  Subject: Researchers report some interesting new findings about the benefits of washing one’s hands.

As always, questions, comments – and suggestions – are welcomed.

Enjoy~ – bz

P.S. If you’re interested in learning how coaching might help you or your staff, phone (847-291-9735) or email (info@ggci.com) to schedule an exploratory phone conversation.

P. P.S.  The GGCI Newsletter Archives are at: www.ggci.com/newsletter.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. 2010q2 GGCI Newsletter
  2. 2010q1 GGCI Newsletter
  3. The ABCs of Good Employees … and Bad Bosses
  4. LeadershipHaiku

Rules of the Leadership Road

“We need some basic rules of the road — clear rules every leader would need to follow, or risk having their licenses suspended.” So says Monica Moses in the June 2010 issue of Workforce Management magazine. Interesting notion.

Her suggestions for what some of those rules might look like?

  1. Give people regular feedback on their performance. Take five minutes every month and tell each direct report what’s going well, what could be better and how you will help. People need to know where they stand.
  2. If an employee is not living up to your expectations, tell her exactly what needs to improve and establish a timeline for improvement. If she doesn’t come up to standard and you need to make a change, tell her privately.
  3. As the boss, your job is to harness the skills of those who work for you and help them reach their potential. Nurture their talents for the good of the organization.

“Leadership,” she says, “is a code of honor. “There are leaders who get results and practice compassion and integrity. There just aren’t enough of them.”

Spot-on, Monica!

To further her Rules of the Leadership Road construct, I would like to add a few additional road-rules, based on how an auto insurance carrier might evaluate the “driving skills” of a leader:

  • Ticketed “moving violations” and “at-fault accidents” (“events”) will remain on a leader’s permanent record for three and five years, respectively — even if s/he changes employers.
  • All “events” will trigger a commensurate decrease the leader’s Safety Rating (read: pay).
  • The first “at-fault accident” may be waived under an Accident Forgiveness Policy, but only if the leader officially asks for forgiveness from whomever s/he mistreated, AND such forgiveness is given.
  • One “moving violation” can be expunged through the successful completion of a certified training, tutelage, or executive coaching program, AND submission of a written introspective-analysis of the “event” and the Lessons Learned from it.
  • More than three “events” within a three-year period automatically results in the leader being put on a formal performance improvement plan.

Hmm, that would likely raise the leadership bar, don’t you think?!

And what about you? What are some other Rules of the Leadership Road that you’d like to see?

—–
Image Source: http://smart-driving.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Are ‘soft skills’ really important?
  2. Assessing your Leadership Capacity
  3. Five Leadership Essentials
  4. RockStarLeader Guest Post #5: Leadership Lessons from Wynton Marsalis

Are ‘soft skills’ really important?

From the GottaGettaBLOG! Archives, this one from December 2003:

On one of the message boards I frequent, someone asked for a good definition for the term ‘soft skills’. Here’s how I replied:

“When I think of ‘soft skills’ I think of how airline pilots can smoothly land a plane. Sure, a crash would address the basic need – to get us out of the sky – but we passengers wouldn’t be so quick to line up for the next flight now would we?!

In a business (and leadership) context, soft skills are what enable safe landings, too – they encourage and motivate people to literally and figuratively stay on board, regardless of how bumpy the flight has been.

“Now isn’t that a refreshing way to look at it?”

Research increasingly shows a definite value Return on Investment (ROI) when a leader works on his/her ‘soft skills’ - http://www.ggci.com/ROI/SurveySays6.htm#calculation.
—–
Image Source: http://cdn-www.airliners.net/

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. More Research on Executive Coaching
  2. David Clutterbuck Presentation
  3. Science and Buddhism
  4. High Potential Coaching – Panel Discussion

Post-Outage Evaluations

Here’s a re-posting of a blog entry I did on back in October 2003, called Effective Post-Mortem Discussions that still has plenty of relevance for anyone in Information Technology Systems Management, or Operations:

The crisis is over. The situation is past. Now how do we bring closure to this difficult set of experiences?

Most people don’t use post-mortems, but I think it’s an important step to bring closure and allow healing – especially after a difficult situation. Here are the steps I’ve used to great success:

1. Gather all players together (including vendor personnel, if appropriate) and thank everyone for their efforts. Focus on trying to put everyone at ease so they know it’s not an inquisition and it’s okay to relax. [This is not about ascribing blame, but about officially putting an end to the crisis .]

2. Review what happened by having people ‘tell the story’ of what happened. Encourage everyone to add to the story no matter how small their role. Look to understand, not to blame. Show everyone the utmost respect. [Make this a conversational process so that both large AND smallpieces of the story are shared.]

3. Look for Lessons Learned. Ask “What did we learn from all this?” “What changes do we want to make moving forward?” etc. [There are two very important goals, here: (1) to understand what happened (the 'root cause'); and  (2) to understand what needs to be put in place so that this same problem NEVER happens again.]

4. Assign follow-up tasks and due dates, as appropriate. Have someone put these assignments in writing and distribute to everyone within 24 hours. [Track these deliverables carefully through to completion, because now that the crisis is over, employees likely have other, more urgent, things to work on and these assignments may never get done unless they are tracked.]

5. Make them laugh. Thank them again. Get ‘em back to work.

Hope this helps.

Image Source: http://testdevices.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. RockStarLeader Guest Post #5: Leadership Lessons from Wynton Marsalis
  2. Telephone-as-Panacea … NOT!
  3. The ABCs of Good Employees … and Bad Bosses
  4. Who Motivates YOU?

The ABCs of Good Employees … and Bad Bosses

Many leaders attempt to upgrade an organization’s hiring practices by reciting their ABCs: “A-players hire A-players. B-players hire C-players.”  But my view is that this admittedly clever phraseology is misguided, at best, and downright inflammatory, at worst. Here’s why:

  1. Many A-players don’t know HOW to hire A-Players. Let’s face it, many A-players are A-players simply because their skills and talents happen to be particularly well-aligned with the key functional responsibilities of their current job. But, one’s ability to interview and select others is rarely considered one of those key functional responsibilities–it’s typically just “something else” they’re also responsible for. So when asked to actually interview applicants,  A-players often don’t know how to do it. You see, anyone who DOES know how, knows it takes a considerable amount of time and effort to learn how to accurately identify people who truly CAN bring fresh ideas, new ways, diversified perspectives, stellar capabilities, and more, just from asking a job applicant a handful of interview questions. And it’s probably fair to say that many A-players never took the time (or had ample opportunity) to learn the ins and outs of effective hiring and selection because they were so busy being … A-players! But as such, A-players often DON’T hire A-players, even if you want to think that they do.
  2. Some A-players do hire A-players, but not all jobs require A-players in them. You see many (most?) A-players want (need?) a steady stream of new challenges and opportunities to continue to learn and grow, advance, thrive, and maybe to show off a bit. But some jobs are more about one’s mastery of responsibilities than the expansion of them. So putting an A-player into a job that requires mastery, but not fast-track expansion, creates a mis-match that neither benefits the individual, nor the organization – not to mention the negative impact it can have on the person’s co-workers.
  3. It is ridiculously arrogant to categorize B-players  and C-players as being somehow “Less Than.” B-players and C-players are typically not overpaid (as so many A-players are); not as political (as so many A-players are); and not as needy (as so many A-players are). They also tend to be very nice, honest, caring, human beings who are more than willing to give you an honest day’s work, too. “Less Than?!” I don’t think so.
  4. B-players and C-players routinely do exceptional work, every day. B-players and C-players can–and do–make important, and lasting, contributions to the success of countless organizations. Ever wonder why A-players get to work on so many cool, new, high-profile, initiatives? It’s due, in large part, because the B-players and C-players are taking care of the “ongoing” part of the business so the A-players don’t have to. It’s good to remember that, actually.

I think the thing that bugs me the most about the whole A-, B-, and C-player thing, though, is how disingenuous it often is: Far too often a boss will blame B- and C-players to hide his/her own inability to: strategize; prioritize; communicate effectively; say ‘no’ to unrealistic pressures from above, when necessary; make tough decisions; share credit; take responsibility; and generally be the type of boss people WANT to work for.

Yes, it’s far easier to blame others–it’s certainly easier than looking in the mirror and seeing someone who really isn’t as much of an A-player as he or she would like to believe, eh?!

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. 2010q3 GGCI Newsletter
  2. LeadershipHaiku
  3. Post-Outage Evaluations
  4. Building Resilience Between Jobs

What is Collaboration?

from LeadershipHaiku

//
Collaboration
/
is finding a common ground
/
from which to advance.
//

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. LeadershipHaiku
  2. What is Confidence?
  3. Science and Buddhism
  4. David Clutterbuck Presentation

More Research on Executive Coaching

Courtesy of the Kilkenny Advertiser over in Ireland (Copyright 2010 Kilkenny Advertiser):

Executive Coaching has gained recognition as being one of the most positive and powerful tools in the armoury of organisations which truly wish to ensure that their most importance resource, their people, are working to their potential.

Research indicates that the top reasons for utilising an executive coach include:

1) Sharpening the leadership skills of high-potential individuals (86 per cent);

2) Correcting management behaviour problems such as poor communication skills, failure to develop subordinates, or indecisiveness (72 per cent);

3) Ensuring the success, or decreasing the failure rate, of newly promoted managers (64 per cent);

4) Correcting employee relations problems such as poor interpersonal skills, disorganisation, demeaning or arrogant behaviour (59 per cent);

5) Providing the required management and leadership skills to technically oriented employees (58 per cent).

More coaching research results — and information on working with GottaGettaCoach! — are available at: www.ggci.com/research/.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. High Potential Coaching – Panel Discussion
  2. Rules of the Leadership Road
  3. Assessing your Leadership Capacity
  4. Are ‘soft skills’ really important?

The Interpersonal Influence Inventory

One of the behavioral-type assessments I like to use is the Interpersonal Influence Inventory (III) as it measures the behaviors that individuals use when they attempt to influence others.  For over 20 years, this popular learning instrument – now in its fourth edition – has helped thousands of professionals assess their own influence styles and work toward communicating more effectively.

One’s Influence Style, of course, is influenced by several factors:

  •   Individual Factors
    • Past Experience — what we’ve learned about which behaviors lead to positive or negative results
    • Attitudes and Beliefs — the internal messages we send ourselves about how to act and react
    • Self-Confidence — our ability to stand up for ourselves and our rights in varying circumstances 
  • Situational Factors
    • Rewards in the Environment — ways a work environment “encourages” desirable behaviors
    • Costs of Influence Style — ways a work environment “penalizes” undesirable behaviors 
    • Rules and Laws — ways a work environment differentiates desirable and undesirable behaviors

In it’s simplest form, the III self-assessment answers the question: How do you “come across” to others in your organization?


This month, GottaGettaCoach!, Inc. is offering the Interpersonal Influence Inventory (III) for just $25 when you use coupon code “HALF-OFF-III” when ordering at: http://bit.ly/dn4yVz.


For more information on the Interpersonal Influence Inventory (III) and the other assessments that GottaGettaCoach!, Inc. offers: http://www.ggci.com/leadership-development/iii.htm.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Assessing your Leadership Capacity
  2. Four Ways to Manage Conflict
  3. GottaGettaCoach! Celebrates 10-year Anniversary
  4. More Research on Executive Coaching

What is Confidence?

from LeadershipHaiku

//
 What is confidence
/
but helping others see you
/
at your very best?
//

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. What is Collaboration?
  2. LeadershipHaiku
  3. Assessing your Leadership Capacity
  4. Jan2010 #MorningThoughts

NBD Mid-Level Managers

Baseball’s back! And, okay, the Chicago Cubs record is a lowly 1 win and 2 losses. But that 1 win happened last night, so they’re actually on a wining streak! (Go ahead, say what you will; I’ve heard it all before!)

Last night’s win went to Randy Wells, who threw six shutout innings against the Braves. Wells, 28, burst onto the scene last year with a 12-10 record (after only 4 games in the “Bigs” in 2008) and is continuing to impress those around him. But even though he’s not all that young for a Major League pitcher, his spirit is:

“I’m not at the stage of my career where I can distinguish which games are big and which games aren’t,” Wells said. They all are (big) for me.”

I like that! Not just because he’s a Cubs pitcher, but because what he said is also relevant to middle managers about their attitudes and leadership tendencies.  

You see, when (small l) leaders are faced with a new challenge, problem, or issue, the first thing that too many of them do is assess “how big of a deal” it is … so to decide what NOT to give their all to. Then, anything they consider to be NBD (No Big Deal) is wait-listed, DE-prioritized, or flat-out ignored. As a former middle-manager colleague of mine was fond of saying, “NBD — If they want it bad enough, they’ll ask twice.”

Is it too Pollyanna-ish to wonder how much more could get done if (small l) leaders treated every task, assignment, project, and initiative, etc.,  as Wells treats each and every one of his starts?

Sure, Wells only plays once every 5 games, while leaders typically get (at least) 5 issues to deal with before finishing their (first) cup-o-coffee. Yet one of the things that separates (small l) leaders from (capital L) Leaders is that (capital L) Leaders consider EVERY task, assignment, project, and initiative, etc., as Wells does — as big, and proceed accordingly.

How about you, Mr./Ms. Middle-Manager? What’s holding YOU back from treating them ALL big? Chances are, it has something to do with how well you do (or don’t) delegate.

NBD? Hardly!

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Level III Success
  2. High Potential Coaching – Panel Discussion
  3. More on the Three Levels of Success
  4. More Research on Executive Coaching

2010q2 GGCI Newsletter

The 2010q2 edition of the GottaGettaCoach! newsletter is now on-line at: http://www.ggci.com/newsletter/GGCI-2010q2.pdf

  • Levels of Success • Topic: Editor’s Note •  Subject: It’s rarely an all-or-none sort of thing
  • How to Get Happier • Topic: Personal Development •  Subject: Five how-to’s to incorporate into your daily living
  • LeadershipHaiku • Topic: Leadership Development • Subject: My latest side-project — it’s well-worth a look-see if I do say so myself!
  • Assessing Your Leadership Capacity • Topic: Leadership Development • Subject: Foundational concepts for expanding your Leadership reach and impact
  • A “Tweet” to Start Your Day • Topic: Personal Development •  Subject: Some Morning Thoughts courtesy of my Twitter-stream
  • Tylenol for Social Pains?! • Topic: Fear and Courageousness •  Subject: Acetaminophen — it’s not just for headaches anymore!
  • GGCI News from Last Quarter • Topic: News of Note • Some GottaGettaCoach! highlights from 2010q1
  • Name it; Frame it; then, Claim it • Topic: Job Search Improvements •  Subject: An interviewees guide to the Inner-Game of powerful interviewing

As always, questions, comments – and suggestions – are welcomed.

Enjoy~ – bz

P.S. If you’re interested in learning how coaching might help you or your staff, phone (847-291-9735) or email (info@ggci.com) to schedule an exploratory phone conversation.

P. P.S. The GGCI Newseltter Archives are located at : www.ggci.com/newsletter. And please feel free to “share this” this newsletter with those in your network who might appreciate it. Just click on the link below.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. 2010q1 GGCI Newsletter
  2. 2010q3 GGCI Newsletter
  3. Leadership Development Carnival – Feb2010
  4. GottaGettaCoach! Celebrates 10-year Anniversary

Building Resilience Between Jobs

In its March 31, 2010 newsletter, TheLadders published my latest article, titled, Building Resilience Between Jobs.

Indeed, as the days turn into weeks … and months, it’s not unusual for the inherent stress and strain of a job search to start wearing you down – mentally, physically and emotionally. And, for many, that emotional component is the most debilitating, according to a December New York Times/CBS News poll of the unemployed:

“Nearly half of the adults surveyed admitted to feeling embarrassed or ashamed most of the time or sometimes as a result of being out of work. Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the traditional image of men as breadwinners, men were significantly more likely than women to report feeling ashamed most of the time.”

There’s no shame in this. It simply is what it is. But what CAN a executive-level job seeker do to increase the odds of NOT feeling embarrassed or ashamed while out of work? What steps can you take to re-energize your job search, confidence and dignity?

Read the full article, via the link above or at: http://ggci.com/Articles/TheLadders-2010-03-26.htm, to find out!

And for other articles I’ve written for TheLadders:http://theladders.com/career-search?contentSearchKeyword=zweibel&fromSearch=true.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Four Ways to Manage Conflict
  2. What Job Would Make You Happy?
  3. The R.I.G.H.T. Job for You?
  4. Job Search Resources

Assessing your Leadership Capacity

What affects your Leadership Capacity? Working up from the bottom of the pyramid:

  • Personal and Professional Resilience – Anyone can be a compelling Leader when things are going well. But it’s the leadership we demonstrate when things are NOT going well that really defines our leadership style, reputation, and brand. So it’s how well we RECOVER from problems – how RESILIENT we are – that really tells the tale. As such, look for opportunities to show your resilience to those who can change your future. Indeed, that’s one of the reasons why the people who “screw up” get promoted while the one’s who do everything perfectly often do not.
  • Clarity in Ambiguity – Anyone can be a compelling Leader when all of your questions are answered. But it’s the leadership we demonstrate when certain pieces of key information are MISSING, when there is more AMBIGUITY than not, that shows our true leadership capacity. As such, the better we are at connecting the dots, inferring answers, and helping others realize what information is NOT needed to move forward, the better.
  • Confidence and Perspective — If we have personal and professional resilience, and if we are able to derive clarity from ambiguity, our confidence naturally increases. With that added confidence, our ability to see things more strategically (with greater perspective) naturally increases, as well. The value of perspective cannot be understated – you’ll do well to remember that the next time you’re in a conflict or wanting to convince someone of something.
  • Greater Organizational Impact and Influence – The fastest way to earn more leadership responsibility is to demonstrate you can impact and influence your peers, staff, and superiors in the organization, in positive and meaningful ways. But in many ways, this ability is a BYPRODUCT of the prior three elements. Indeed, combining personal and professional resilience with an ability to find clarity in ambiguity results in the type of confidence and perspective that makes having greater organizational impact and influence (read: having additional leadership capacity) all the more likely. But without those underpinnings, your efforts to impact and influence will likely go unnoticed or unappreciated, or worse yet, be an sign that you have reached your leadership capacity and can go (grow) no further.
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. GottaGettaCoach! Celebrates 10-year Anniversary
  2. The Interpersonal Influence Inventory
  3. 2010q2 GGCI Newsletter
  4. 2010q3 GGCI Newsletter

More on the Three Levels of Success

To pick up on a thread from a few weeks ago, there are Three Levels of Success in the workplace:

  1. Level I Success = Insuring that your functional responsibilities are done well.
  2. Level II Success = Level I Success + Ably assisting on special projects and priorities, as assigned.
  3. Level III Success = Level I Success + Level II Success + “Furthering the Strategic Imperative, regularly and consistently.

(For more thorough definitions, see  Three Levels of Success blog post.)

Now to better understand what each Level of Success might look like on any given day, let’s look at the following:

  • Primary direction of influence
    • Level I – Down the Chain
    • Level II – Up the Chain
    • Level III – Across the Chain
  • How feedback is treated
    • Level I – As something to be Disputed
    • Level II – As something to be Accepted
    • Level III – As something to be Sought
  • Focus of Attention
    • Level I – Systems/Workflow Optimization
    • Level II – Being a “Go To” Person
    • Level III – Providing Thought Leadership
  • Key Challenges
    • Level I – Task Management
    • Level II – People Management
    • Level III – Self-Management
  • Questions Asked
    • Level I – To gather information
    • Level II – To gather insights
    • Level III – To stimulate thinking
  • Awareness
    • Level I – What’s going right
    • Level II – What’s going wrong
    • Level III – What needs to happen

See the differences? Helpful?

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Level III Success
  2. More Research on Executive Coaching
  3. Post-Outage Evaluations
  4. The Path of Success

Five Leadership Essentials

#Leadership Essentials (1 of 5) by Rosabeth Moss Kanter: “Straight talk about problems and expectations.”

#Leadership Essentials (2 of 5) by Rosabeth Moss Kanter: “The courage to admit responsibility for problems.”

#Leadership Essentials (3 of 5) by Rosabeth Moss Kanter: “Open dialogue and widespread communication”

#Leadership Essentials (4 of 5) by Rosabeth Moss Kanter: “Clear priorities and attention to details.”

#Leadership Essentials (5 of 5) by Rosabeth Moss Kanter: “Performance feedback — the mirror of accountability.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Rules of the Leadership Road
  2. More on the Three Levels of Success
  3. Assessing your Leadership Capacity
  4. Connecting Better

Squaring the Corners

A recent Twitter “rant” of mine!

  • @ggci: There’s a certain personal pride that comes from “squaring the corners” in everything you do.
  • @ggci: We can still work quickly when Squaring the Corners; we just do it RIGHT.
  • @ggci: Squaring the Corners isn’t about doing something EXTRA; it’s doing what’s truly NEEDED…and not an iota less.
  • @ggci: The problem with Perfectionism is that we work and work and work and STILL end up dissatisfied with what we’ve done.
  • @ggci: Squaring the Corners is about doing precisely what’s needed – no more (okay, maybe a bit more) and absolutely no less.
  • @ggci: Look at what you worked on yesterday. Did you CUT corners or SQUARE them? And how about TODAY? Remember, you get to choose.

—–

Image Source: chezmojophoto.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Slide, that is, DON'T Slide
  2. Feb2010 #MorningThoughts
  3. Marshall Goldsmith Keynote
  4. Synergy versus Leverage

Level III Success

I’m often asked to talk about how the “rules” change when someone is promoted from, say, manager to director, or senior director to vice president. Oh, make no mistake, the “rules” most certainly DO change. So you don’t want to get caught using old rules in a new position. Take a look at the chart:

  1. My working definition of Level I Success – the kind of success that most people strive for, and often even achieve — is: “Insuring that your functional responsibilities are done well.” Indeed Level I Success is the foundation for all higher levels of success. It’s just one that many (most?) Line-Operative, Supervisors and newer Managers tend to see as their ENTIRE job description…which often it is.
  2. I submit, though, that Level II Success becomes what’s required for more seasoned managers and up through those in director and senior director roles to achieve if they are to be considered “high potentials” (hi-po) or “above average” performers. These people cannot rest on their Level I Success. Indeed, it now takes their Level I Success + “Ably assisting on special projects and priorities, as assigned”  for then to be considered successful at all. In other words, what defines success at Level I, is merely a portion – and a relatively small portion, at that — of what’s needed to enable Level II Success. You may not like it, but just doing your (Level I) job no longer guarantees success.
  3. Level III Success raises the bar even further. At the Vice President Senior Vice President and C-level (CEO, CFO, CIO, COO, etc.) in an organization, one’s Level I and Level II Success is considered simply “table stakes” — prerequisites on any given day. Their Level III Success comes only from Level I Success + Level II Success + “Furthering the Strategic Imperative, regularly and consistently.”

“Okay, fine. But what if my current responsibilities don’t involve me in any “Strategic Imperative” work?” you might ask. If that’s the case, then a VP-level person or higher only has two real options: (1) Try to achieve as much Level I and Level II Success as you possibly can, even though it likely WON’T result in you getting an exemplary performance review; or (2) Figure out how to get yourself involved with your company’s Strategic Imperative so that Level III Success becomes a bona fide option for you.

How? I could tell you, but better you think this through for yourself at this point. :)

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. More on the Three Levels of Success
  2. Job Search Resources
  3. High Potential Coaching – Panel Discussion
  4. The ABCs of Good Employees … and Bad Bosses

13 Fatal Management Errors

Again, courtesy of Bernie Ritchie and her ManagementSushi blog, my third guest post, which she’s titled: Lethal Cocktails : Fatal Management Errors to be avoided!, is now on-line.

The piece takes a look, so many years later, at what was an “able compass” for me – and many of those who reported to me – as I climbed the management ranks, back in the day. Here’s an excerpt: Briefly, here are the 13 Fatal Errors:

  1. Refuse to Accept Personal Accountability
  2. Fail to Develop People
  3. Try to Control Results Instead of Influencing Thinking
  4. Join the Wrong Crowd
  5. Manage Everyone the Same Way
  6. Forget the Importance of Profit
  7. Concentrate on Problems Rather than Objectives
  8. Be a Buddy, Not a Boss
  9. Fail to Set Standards
  10. Fail to Train Your People
  11. Condone Incompetence
  12. Recognize Only Top Performers
  13. Try to Manipulate People

So what do YOU think? Are you seeing any of these Fatal Errors occurring here in 2010? I know I am. But let’s see what else Brown had to say that might still be relevant today … (… continued at http://managementsushi.com/.)

Thanks, Bernie!

—–

Image Source: clarkandransom.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. 2010q1 GGCI Newsletter
  2. More Research on Executive Coaching
  3. Five Leadership Essentials
  4. Rules of the Leadership Road

Leadership Development Carnival – Feb2010

The February 2010 edition of the Leadership Development Carnival has been published by Talented Apps. Included is a link to The Heart of Effective Personal Management, a blog post by Barry Zweibel. Enjoy!  

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Carnival of Inspiration and Motivation: 26th Edition
  2. 2010q1 GGCI Newsletter
  3. GottaGettaCoach! Celebrates 10-year Anniversary
  4. LeadershipHaiku